<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://50.77.162.165/mediawiki/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Arbitrary code execution service - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://50.77.162.165/mediawiki/index.php?title=Arbitrary_code_execution_service&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.5-7</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:16:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>76.179.110.215 at 19:31, 6 November 2010</title>
			<link>http://50.77.162.165/mediawiki/index.php?title=Arbitrary_code_execution_service&amp;diff=2114&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<guid>http://50.77.162.165/mediawiki/index.php?title=Arbitrary_code_execution_service&amp;diff=2114&amp;oldid=prev</guid>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Trusted third parties&amp;quot; come up a lot in protocols for various things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, there's a bootstrapping problem: if protocol X doesn't have any well-known trusted third parties, then nobody can use protocol X. If nobody is using protocol X, then there's no market for someone to build a &amp;quot;X server&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there was a way to price E code (how much cpu, storage, bandwidth, will running this E code consume? How long does this server have to stay up?) then someone could run an &amp;quot;arbitrary code execution service&amp;quot; and people interested in running protocol X could create (and pay for) &amp;quot;X servers&amp;quot;, trusting that the arbitrary code execution service's business model is to &amp;quot;be the trusted third party&amp;quot;, rather than mining the data flowing through their server, for example.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:31:13 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>76.179.110.215</dc:creator>			<comments>http://50.77.162.165/wiki/Talk:Arbitrary_code_execution_service</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>