Agoric opaque box - Revision history

Zarutian at 01:04, 15 March 2009

Zarutian — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:04:34 GMT

New page

The concept is introduced in [http://web.archive.org/web/20071118205050/www.agorics.com/Library/agoricpapers/aos/aos.6.html#section6.1.2 Agoric Open Systems: Agoric Systems in the Large - Section 6.1.2 Hardware Encapsulation]

It is criticised in [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]

Reasoning of that post was rebutted on #erights on irc.freenode.org .

The rebuttal was somewhat like this:
The boxes need not to trust each other. Only the developers need to trust an brand of an opaque box.
Therefore what trust between two brands of opaque boxes is inhertenly based on the trust of the developer
that programmed an system that could span them in these brands.

Zarutian: adding rebuttal to critism of agoric opaque boxes

Zarutian — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:01:59 GMT

adding rebuttal to critism of agoric opaque boxes

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 15 March 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It is criticised in [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]		It is criticised in [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]
		+
		+	Reasoning of that post was rebutted on #erights on irc.freenode.org .
		+
		+	The rebuttal was somewhat like this:
		+	The boxes need not to trust each other. Only the developers need to trust an brand of an opaque box.
		+	Therefore what trust between two brands of opaque boxes is inhertenly based on the trust of the developer
		+	that programmed an system that could span them for the brands in these brands.

Zarutian: just another minor edit

Zarutian — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:50:21 GMT

just another minor edit

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 15 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~Intro to~~ concept ~~goes here~~.	+	The concept is introduced in [http://web.archive.org/web/20071118205050/www.agorics.com/Library/agoricpapers/aos/aos.6.html#section6.1.2 Agoric Open Systems: Agoric Systems in the Large - Section 6.1.2 Hardware Encapsulation]

-	~~----~~	+	It is criticised in [http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]
-		+
-	[http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]	+

Zarutian: Adding notes

Zarutian — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:39:27 GMT

Adding notes

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:39, 15 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~The~~ concept ~~is introduced in [http://web~~.~~archive.org/web/20071118205050/www.agorics.com/Library/agoricpapers/aos/aos.6.html#section6.1.2 Agoric Open Systems: Agoric Systems in the Large - Section 6.1.2 Hardware Encapsulation]~~	+	Intro to concept goes here.

-	~~It is criticised in [http://www.eros~~-~~os.org/~majordomo/e~~-~~lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]~~	+	----

-	~~Reasoning of that post was rebutted on #erights on irc~~.~~freenode~~.org .	+	[http://www.eros-os.org/~majordomo/e-lang/1075.html Against opaque boxes]
-		+
-	~~The rebuttal was somewhat like this:~~	+
-	~~The boxes need not to trust each other. Only the developers need to trust an brand of an opaque box.~~	+
-	~~Therefore what trust between two brands of~~ opaque boxes ~~is inhertenly based on the trust of the developer~~	+
-	~~that programmed an system that could span them in these brands.~~	+